HANEY v. GARCIA

There is going to be electricity at the Barclay Center tomorrow on 4/20…. (2024). Devin “The Dream” Haney versus Ryan “King Ry” Garcia. Really quick, on a separate note, that fighters take on nicknames, like urban youth throwing up tags… mine was “epic”, is a little hilarious because this the only sport that formalizes those monikers or nicknames. But now back to the reason I’m writing this blarticle…. the fight between these young fighters is going to be pretty amazing, IF… and only if…. they are allowed to fight without outside interference. Lets hope that this will be the case, right. Fair fight on a fair night. That being said, the winner of this fight is easy to pick… it’s the one with the most points at the end of the night or the one that’s standing when it’s all over. The way I see it is, this fight can go either way with a 55% to 45% advantage to the person that is able to implement their game plan and not let the other person adjust.

Let’s start with Devin Haney (pictured above yelling at the mirror in constant professionalism as he practices to yell at Garcia) is the undefeated 140 pound Champion with a record of 31 wins with 15 big wins by curing insomnia. Haney’s biggest asset is his IQ and his mobility. His path to a win is to not let people chirp and forget about going for the KO. It will come if it comes. Haney’s specialty is quick shots and having his opponent walk into a big shot. Haney has to mix up his shots and do quick side steps and counters. If he goes at Garcia, he is going to run into something. Luckily for Haney, Garcia has two modes… fast and faster, which should play into his bag of tricks. Haney needs to keep that right hand at home when he isn’t using it and rely on his jab. Haney has a bad habit of leaving his right side exposed and he needs to definitely correct that for this fight.

The opponent, Ryan Garcia (pictured above seemingly readying himself for Haney by getting ready to headbutt a ram) is the uber (meaning very and not the taxi) talented fighter with a record of 24 wins with a sole defeat against a pound for pound lightweight with 20 big wins followed by his opponents asking “how long have I been asleep” zzzzzzzz’s…… Garcia’s biggest asset is no surprise to anyone, it’s his speed and his ability to change direction on his punches. Garcia’s path to win this is to mix up patience with controlled aggression and some feints. Garcia has to rack up the points early and move to make Haney desperate and than force Haney to come to him, which as sure as the doctor slapped yo mama when you were born, Haney will do if he is behind on points. If Garcia can pull that off, he will KO Haney, absent any outside interference. Garcia needs to learn to tuck his chin to avoid being knocked down and his one weakness is that he always goes straight back instead of off-lining to the right or left like he should. He needs to step right or left to stay in range and needs to pump that jab like he is playing that slots.

Both of these fighters, regardless of what is seen leading up to the fight, are good guys. The magnitude of this fight is getting to them but you have to realize that they are both young and they are both hungry and they both want to win. Too bad you can’t have two winners because I believe they both deserve a win but this is the hurt business not the heart business. You perform and then you extend your gratitude to your opponent. Let’s hope that they can keep it professional in there.

My prediction is that the best man will win, hopefully…. Most pros have Haney winning and he is the betting favorite, but there are a few that have Garcia pulling off the upset. Good luck to both.

BOXING PARODY

Ahhh… the great sport of boxing has become a parody. Before I tell you why I think that, let’s go over the history of prize fighting.

Boxing used to be a sport that was introduced by the Greeks. Before the mid-third century B.C., the ancient Greek Olympics were called the Hekatomboia. This festival involved the sacrifice of 100 oxen and attracted participants from all over Greece. The ancient Olympics were so successful that the Greeks created the Panhellenic Games, which were four games in four different city-states to honor different gods. The Olympics lasted nearly 1,000 years until they were outlawed in 393 CE by the Roman Emperor Theodosius I. However, they were revived again in 1896.

Boxing, or something similar, was represented in those games as people that had their hands wrapped in cloth fought… that was part of the games. As legend has it, Mikus Tysonious was the first ever champion, yeah that would have been pretty funny but the actual name of the person was Onomastus, which in Greek means famous, which I’m guessing was his fight name, a lot like the “Gypsy King”, because I can’t imagine that someone would just name their kid Famous. But it was Greece, so who the hell knows. Hey, did you see what Famous did, he wrote graffiti on the Temple of Hera. That Famous… always getting into trouble.

Boxing resurfaced in England in the early 16th century in the form of bare-knuckle boxing, sometimes referred to as prizefighting. Boxing was introduced in the United States in the late 1700s but began to take root there only about 1800. Irish immigrants are said to have introduced boxing to the United States as they migrated to the Northeast throughout the 1860s and 1870s with the first Heavyweight Champion being John L. Sullivan, the son of Irish immigrants, who was said later in life to become friends with an Irish guy named Bailey…. and he used his cream to get in shape for his fights. Bailey’s Irish Cream would eventually be the downfall of the Champion.

As the years went on we seen great champions come and go. Boxing was such an adored sport that one of the famous figures in history, Muhammad Ali, is world renowned. To be the heavyweight champion of the world brought a certain amount of prestige… most of the time. Now, boxing is losing its panache. With social media and everyone having a camera ready to shoot someone at their worst, these famous fighters are confronting things their predecessors didn’t have to. But the worst part of the situation is how technology can affect your performance. Boxing is no longer a sport that is determined on skill but on who has less baggage or is more liked by the “power company”. That electricity and wave particle duality or particle wave physics has more of an outcome to determine who wins a fight than the fighters themselves makes boxing a joke.

The fighters are aware of this and they constantly try to make their opponent into some kind of Bond villain in the hopes of not being affected by these outside entities. They would rather see their opponent be affected. It’s a sad state of affairs when sports is no longer sports but people trying to please an unknown master. I still watch boxing but only to see which of the two opponents is going to be affected. Being the best is no longer necessary, now you have to win popularity contests.

Thank God it wasn’t that way… at least not as much… in the days of Ali.

LOPEZ v. ORTIZ

What a fight ….. or maybe… where was the fight? I understand how everyone feels, Ortiz definitely had a game plan that offset Lopez’s best qualities. It was smart, slick and worthy of mention but a lot like Stevenson v. De Los Santos, it doesn’t make for the best fights. The reason why Lopez won a close fight that could have gone either way is because 1) he was already the Champion and you have to take the belt from the champion (as noted by allowing the champion to keep his or her belts in case of a draw), 2) Ortiz wasn’t overwhelmingly landing more shots than Lopez, he barely landed more and none were significant and 3) finally, because if you reward a close fight like that to the slick guy and not the guy that was pressing the action, you will end up killing boxing because viewers, not the hard core guys but the ones that watch it for the entertainment factor, will go to any other sport and not the track meet in a 20 foot square. While I became a fan of Ortiz and his skillful display, rudimentary fans that are watching for the first time may never watch again. That’s why, if you are going to make the stick and move your game plan, you better overwhelm statistically with punches landed, you have to leave no doubt….. and while that’s a sad fact….. it’s a fact nonetheless. Ultimately, this a business, and if you deliver fights like that night after night, boxing will die, and that’s why Ortiz lost. That being said, if Ortiz was the champion and he was defending his belt(s), he would have gotten the win.

That brings us to another perplexing situation, Lopez, for as good as he is, has one major flaw, almost all boxers do, he can’t handle movement. He needs to correct this. He should have stopped and forced the challenger to follow him. He is the champion and if no one lands a shot, he retains the belt. I mean, hell, the fight was about that boring anyway. Not as bad as Stevenson v De Los Santos, but close. Got to have a game plan for the guys that are not going to stand there and trade.

The right guy won…. but not because he won but because the other guy didn’t do enough to win…. if that makes sense. Boxing scoring is subjective as opposed to objective, that’s the correct phrasing, I looked it up to make sure, which means that unless a KO is achieved, the fight is left in the hands of judges who make a decision based on their experience and also what is best for the sport. I know, it sucks… but if boxing is to survive, you have to force the fights to be entertaining or at least, in cases where the fight is so tactical and technical, decisive. It has always been that way.

But if I was a matchmaker…. Teo Lopez vs. Conor Benn…. that would definitely be an all action fight and Benn, who is a top ten contender in a heavier division, assuming that he can make the 140 pound limit, would be coming down or Lopez can go up for one fight. That action packed fight would make up for this tactical fight. And since both fighters just fought 12 rounders, the time off would fit. May 4th is still open….

Anecdote

I was always the smartest person in a room by myself…. then my dog wandered in and it created a conundrum.

A person asked me what I think about the crisis in the middle east with all the warring… I try to stay neutral so I generally say that I don’t know what to say about the insurrection. It’s a thinker….

PRIME GOES PPV

Amazon Prime is getting into boxing and we’re all very (x)cited….. excited, I was trying to be cool there, I probably shouldn’t… we’re all very excited. After viewing 2023, I expect Amazon Prime to try and make their splash by upping last years mega fights. It’s starting this year by featuring one of the most exciting fighters in boxing. Tim Tszyu will be headlining against Keith Thurman…. no, that’s not right, is it? While I have a tremendous amount of respect for Keith “One Time” Thurman and what he did in his career, he has never fought at 154 before and he has lost a lot of his zip. His last fight against Mario Barrios, a really good fighter at 140, who gave Davis a good fight but was eventually Ko’ed by Gervonta, went the distance. Thurman has not gotten a stoppage since 2015 and he poses no threat to Tszyu, whatsoever. The co main event is Rolly Romero vs Pitbull Cruz, a good match up at 135 but there are so many 140 pound fighters that deserve a shot at the title that bringing someone up from 135 pounds, even as good as Isaac Cruz, should be illegal. The 140 pound division is the most stacked division in boxing right now. Lopez, Matias, Haney, Garcia, Taylor, Romero (he’s actually the guy fighting), Russell (probably the most avoided fighter in the division), Barboza, Barroso (yeah, that old guy that hits like two mules)… and the list goes on, that to bring someone up from 135 seems like a move to assure that the belt stays within PBC. Whatever happened last year, it doesn’t seem like it’s going to be duplicated this year. That being said, if this card goes over $30, I won’t be buying it. There’s not enough oooomph in it to make me waste more than that. The best fight on the card is Fundora vs Bohachuk. And that’s not even a title match. No… I hope PBC keeps it reasonable and gets a lot of viewers instead of outpricing themselves and getting limited viewership.

On that note, I hope it doesn’t become a trend that Champions start to look at the lower weights for title challengers. I can just see it now, Fury vs. Inoue…. What are these organizations doing sanctioning these fights. There’s people in that division that worked to get those shots and now you are just going to let these champions fight smaller fighters and call it a title defense. I think a rule needs to be imposed where if you want to fight for a belt at a certain weight class, you either have to have two fights in that weight class or you must beat a top ten contender in that division (unless you’re the champ at the lower division immediately under and moving up one weight class). This is exactly how promoters F**k up boxing. They keep the title shots in their promotions by moving guys in weight classes and then make these guys fight their grandmas. This is money hijacking… and not being fair to the integrity of the sport. These fighters should seek legal counsel and sue for breech of ethics…. that’s a thing right? Can’t just not let these other fighters that earned a shot not make money. If these promoters want to do this, then the belt organizations should force them to relinquish.

IS HAMAS A TERRORIST “GROUP”

Is Hamas a terrorist group? Some people are not going to like my answer but semantics matter. The definition of a terrorist group is:

A terrorist group is a political movement that uses terror as a weapon to achieve its goals. Synonyms of terrorist group include: 

  • FTO
  • Foreign terrorist organization
  • Terrorist organization

A group can be considered a terrorist group if it: 

  • Is from another country
  • Engages in terrorist acts
  • Has the ability and intent to engage in terrorism

The United Nations Security Council defines terrorist acts as: 

  • Criminal acts
  • Committed against civilians
  • With the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury
  • Taking of hostages
  • With the purpose to provoke a state of terror

Terrorism can take the form of: 

  • Explosive devices
  • Active shooter incidents
  • Biological, chemical, radiological/nuclear, or cyber attacks

Some types of terrorism include: 

Criminal, Psychic, War, Political, Revolutionary, Subrevolutionary, Establishment.

For the purpose of Executive Order 13268, “terrorism” is defined to be an activity that (1) involves a violent act or an act dangerous to human life, property, or infrastructure; and (2) appears to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, kidnapping, or hostage-taking.

Since Hamas is the political ruling party in Gaza and seems to be separate of the West Bank in political decision making, then no… Hamas is not a terrorist “group” but fall under the heading of a Terrorist State but that’s a matter of opinion that needs a consensus of the international community.

While some might disagree, it’s actually better for Israel that they are recognized not as a Terrorist “Group” but as a foreign country that invaded another country or even as a Terrorist State. In a war, civilian casualties are expected. In a terrorist attack by a group, there is no need for civilians to be killed even though it will happen when sympathizers of the Terrorist Group try and shield them or are forced to shield them. So they’re not a Terrorist Group but a Terrorist State, due to their remarks, that allows for Israel to protect themselves.

Obviously this is a personal opinion and I do not condone the killing of civilians in any situation but until countries find a way to have Iron Man capabilities, this is the unfortunate consequence. This is also what happens when a terrorist group, that’s a group of people that do not rule politically, are allowed to become a terrorist state, when they force the populous to vote for them and then eliminate voting altogether and they become the governing body of that country or state, and then decide to invade another country. Civilians get hurt and uncivil reverberations spread to other countries as people take sides.

COULD THIS BE THE END OF AN EMPIRE

Throughout history, there is a couple of things that always holds true,

  1. The sun rises on the east and sets on the west
  2. Hot dogs are way better with ketchup than mustard
  3. All empires are doomed to fail

Alright, we know that 2 of those are true, one is a matter of opinion. This blarticle is about the last one on the list. All empires are doomed to fail.

Let’s look at some empires and why they failed…

The Roman Empire. The Roman Empire was the post-Republican state of ancient Rome and is generally understood to mean the period and territory ruled by the Romans following Octavian’s assumption of sole rule under the Principate in 31 BC. It included territory in Europe, North Africa, and Western Asia, and was ruled by emperors. The Roman Empire is one of the most iconic empires in history. Its expansion started from the Roman Republic, and it grew to encompass vast territories. The Roman Empire is not considered the largest in history despite how extremely long it was active. The Roman Empire lasted approximately 500 years, mostly due to its administrative capabilities, technological advancements, and a very effective military force. The reason the Roman Empire failed was due to Political unrest, civil unrest and economic factors such as taxation, inflation, disrupted trade routes and decline in agricultural productivity which translated for today would be the equivalent of no jobs or people weren’t willing to do that job anymore, most likely because they all wanted to be on social media, which for that time was the person putting on the plays.

The Ottoman Empire. The Ottoman Empire, historically and colloquially known as the Turkish Empire, was an empire that controlled much of Southeast Europe, West Asia, and North Africa between the 14th and early 20th centuries. The empire also controlled a southeastern region of Central Europe from the 16th to the late 17th century. At the height of its power (16th–17th century), the Ottoman Empire spanned three continents, controlling much of Southeastern Europe, Western Asia, and North Africa. The Ottoman Empire, an Islamic superpower, ruled much of the Middle East, North Africa and Eastern Europe between the 14th and early 20th centuries. The reason the Ottoman Empire failed was due to Political unrest, civil unrest and economic factors. The buzz was that the Sultan wasn’t interested in running the empire and just wanted to hang out in his harem, according to social media accounts of the time.

The British Empire. The British Empire comprised the dominions, colonies, protectorates, mandates, and other territories ruled or administered by the United Kingdom and its predecessor states. It began with the overseas possessions and trading posts established by England in the late 16th and early 17th centuries. The British Empire and Mongol Empire were the largest and second-largest empire in history, respectively. At its greatest extent, early in the 20th century, the British Empire comprised nearly a quarter of the planet and an equal percentage of its population. The reasons the British Empire failed, I’ll give you three guesses, Political unrest (nobody really liked the Kings back then), civil unrest and economic factors. According to the social media of the day, these Kings were unjust and down right grumpy old douche bags. To be fair, they weren’t in power when the British Empire was actually a force, they had already established a parliament.

What all these empires have in common, besides wanting to conquer everything in sight, was that their failures were the result of the same circumstances. Political unrest, civil unrest, economic factors and the social media of the day played it’s role. While the younger generation might balk at my assertions, “they didn’t even have iphones back then”, they had other things like books and leaflets and while I understand the younger generations position when you tell me “what’s a book and you can’t even write on leafs” (I know it’s leaves but they don’t) it nevertheless holds true that social media, from gossip to todays high tech innovations, like blogs, always played a role in dismantling these empires. So what do you do?

The latest outcry was of a woman who posted Osama Bin Laden’s (OBL) excerpts to tik tok, (a social media website and how do you write on a clock?) that is seen as an afront to democracy. The woman seems to agree with Bin Laden and his lunacy and everyone older than 32, that would be 10 years before September 11th, 2001, are outraged. How can this woman do that and lets ban Tik Tok because we don’t agree with her. Well, there goes the first amendment and here comes the civil unrest, we already have the political unrest and all we need now is a good old fashion depression where the wealthy get richer and the poorer get poorer (To be completely honest, she might have not known who he was and thought he was some kind of musician “You down with OBL, no! not me”). I’m kidding, sort of, as to this lady’s posting OBL excerpts would lead to a nationwide unrest. And I’m not saying to “not” ban Tik Tok for any other reason other than the first amendment, like you feel that social media website is controlled by a foreign country that is purposely sending out misinformation and trying to create discord in a foreign adversary or they are using it to spy on America and Americans, that’s a legit reason to ban any website or social media if it’s true. The symptoms are there though, right? And I hear complaining about it but I don’t hear any solutions. If you think that technological social media sites are creating harm to a democracy, what are your solutions for the problem. Well, I have a story.

My son was doing good in school but I noticed that on the days that he spent more time on his Switch, a Nintendo game console, he would have more problems in school, so I put a time limit on when he could play and how long. 30 minutes on school days as long as he did his homework and did some extra studying and it would have to be off 1 hour prior to him going to bed and 2 hours on weekends as long as he exercised and went outside to play for at least double that time. Maybe it’s time that we do that to our younger adults, maybe all adults, and have these Social Media companies reduce the allotted time for social media to each person to one hour per day on the weekdays and 2 hours on the weekends. Sounds crazy, doesn’t it. That wouldn’t go for the people that actually make a living on social media and the companies would have to determine who they are by viewership or other means. Who knew that our adults need adult supervision. The government and the social media companies could figure out all the finer points on how to make it work and the adults can try to find ways around these rules but I think that some rules are needed. Or (do you like how I start my sentences with articles) we can keep things the way they are, keep bitching and complaining, not coming up with solutions. Watch as American ingenuity goes the way of the Dodo bird and we let this Empire, the American Empire, disintegrate. My bet, which I’m pretty sure I could find a place in Vegas that would take it, is that this Empire comes to a screeching halt in around 100 years. Some people say I’m pretty good at procastinating, wait, that’s wrong…. prognosticating. I was so close.

Also, talking with that woman that posted OBL’s excerpts to find out why she thinks that, might be a greater help than calling her all kind of numbnuts remarks to her face on social media. Obviously, she has her reasons and as misguided as I think they are, she might not. That’s where a good education comes into play, I think. Some civil discourse instead of civil unrest.

And here’s another crazy idea, to relieve political unrest, how about if we get rid of parties, now calm down…. I’m not talking birthdays, I’m talking political, you can still go to your all nighters and raves. How about if there wasn’t a D or an R in front of some ones name at a ballot and they just ran on their values and principles… Crazy huh… I better watch out for the butterfly net.

GENOCIDE

The definition of genocide is the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group.

There are 23 countries in the world that make Islam their state religion and that religion is included in their constitution. There is only 1 country that makes Judaism there state religion.

I don’t know how anyone is able to turn this argument the other way but it’s the people of Israel that are in constant threat of genocide.

The UN has to openly state that Hamas was the ruling political party in Gaza and that what they did was an invasion of Israel and this should be declared a war by two nations. In these circumstances, Israel should make Gaza a nice Israeli beach town when this all over.

To be more clear…..

Judaism is close to 3500 years old and it’s roots start out in what was known as Canaan and is known today as Israel. This was a Jewish state which was forced to scatter by foreign invaders while some still remained in the region. Islam started roughly 1400 years ago. It started in Saudi Arabia, what is known as the mecca of the religion. There is nothing wrong with either religion. The problem is the people not the religions.

The truth still holds that Israel belongs where it is and are not colonizers but re-settlers, going back to their ancestral homeland. Most of the Muslim Palestinians (they used to be known as Jewish Palestinians prior to 1948 when Israel became a recognized country by the UN and its members) are transfers from other Muslim dominated countries that fled to that area. Hamas used to be an Egyptian “group”. In 1987, after the outbreak of the First Intifada against Israel, Hamas was founded by Palestinian imam and activist Ahmed Yassin. It emerged out of his Mujama al-Islamiya, which had been established in Gaza in 1973 as an Islamic charity involved with the Egypt-based Muslim Brotherhood

I’m Christian.

BOXING ON SHOW[TIME IS UP]

It’s the end of an era… Showtime Boxing is ending it’s almost 40 years of boxing. The reasons are being presented as a Paramount decision, after the merger, having something to do with money cutting efforts but I don’t think that is the case, I think it’s more complicated than that. HBO used to be where all the big boxing matches were made and the platform was known to many as the mecca of boxing. Then, out of nowhere, HBO makes a decision to focus on its entertainment side while getting rid of its sports division in 2018. The outcome of that decision was notable. HBO went from 140 million subscribers to a little less than 80 million subscribers. That was immediately following its decision to get rid of its sports division. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that happened and I’m expecting the same thing for Showtime. It will see it’s memberships dwindle as sports fans wait to see who is going to take the mantle as the next mecca of boxing. I, for one, am considering leaving Showtime and waiting for the next big boxing streamer, almost wrote steamer, as some are. If ESPN+ decides to take up the mantle by hosting big time boxing, which seems like a very good place for boxing, then they have some waters to navigate.

The first and most notable obstacle is finding a way to get rid of these promoters with exclusive contracts to networks, which has been an obstacle in putting up good fights in the past. The decision of these promoters to have exclusive deals with networks is what is killing boxing. PBC with Showtime, Top Rank with ESPN, Eddie Hearns with DAZN and these fighters, with these multiple fight deals with these promoters, are now tied to these networks and can’t fight on any other network without permission or they have their career stalled, like what happened to Mikey Garcia, which is just insane. The way to fix it is, to either get rid of the promoters and just let the networks promote without multiple fight deals or for the promoters to stop signing deals with networks and just go on a fight to fight basis with the networks. The other thing that can be done to fix this is to do what Terrence Crawford did, just go on a fight to fight basis with any promoter and have a lawyer that negotiates with the promoters. Terrence Crawford is right when he says that fighters should have all the control, they are the business. Without boxers, there is no boxing. Promoters are just middle men, they aren’t necessary for the sport, boxers and networks are.

In the end, if the promoters want to stay relevant, they need to do what their bosses tell them to do, which is set up the fights they want set up. Who are the bosses?…. the boxers.

GAZA GAZA GONE

How many people feel like Nostradamus predicted this somehow…or that blind little old lady Baba Vanga. There’s people out there screaming end of times right next to the scalper screaming Taylor Swift tickets here. Maybe they’re both signs of some kind of apocalypse. All I know is that there isn’t many people too neutral in this conflict. You either believe that the Palestinians are right or you believe that Israel is right. As for me, I just don’t know enough to think that Hamas could remotely be right in this situation. Maybe there is some kind of argument for their actions, I can’t think of one that would justify their actions, but I’m sure there are some who believe they were justified. Well, I know that there are people that believe that, as I see all over the news… people that say this is Israel’s fault. I would like to hear their argument, one that advocates the murder of partygoers and women and children.

Hamas, labeled a terrorist organization by the State Department since October 8th, 1997, is a militant group that was founded by Palestinian imam and activist Ahmed Yassin. It emerged out of his Mujama al-Islamiya, which had been established in Gaza in 1973 as a religious charity involved with the Egypt-based Muslim Brotherhood. Hamas became increasingly involved in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict by the late 1990s; it opposed the Israel–PLO Letters of Mutual Recognition as well as the Oslo Accords, which saw Hamas’ secular rival Fatah renounce “the use of terrorism and other acts of violence” and recognize Israel in pursuit of a two-state solution. Hamas continued to advocate Palestinian armed resistance. Hamas won the 2006 Palestinian legislative election, gaining a majority in the Palestinian Legislative Council, and subsequently took control of Gaza Strip from Fatah in 2007.

There is roughly 2 million Palestine people in the Gaza Strip and another 2 or so million Palestine people in the West Bank. There are almost 8 million Jewish people in Israel. What I have noticed in these marches to support Palestine is that they are calling out Israel for what they consider apartheid behavior. Their slogans say, “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free”. I don’t understand the slogan because I don’t know what they mean. Are they saying that Palestine should encompass all of what is now known as Israel? Or are they saying that Palestine is not free to do what they want? That they have to follow Israel’s laws? In either case, I don’t believe that Palestine isn’t free to do what they want in their own territory. The population numbers are significant because if Israel and Palestine were to merge into one country, the current number of Israelis outnumber the current number of Palestinians, which means that Israel would still be Israel in a democracy. The only problem being the Hamas faction which would not abide by a democratic election and still try to rule by violence, in my opinion. So, why and try to make it one state when in the end, you would still be outnumbered in a democratic election, unless your goal is to rule over Israelis, even though you are not the majority?

This conflict has deepened some divides in this country, those that are antisemites are going to be more so now and those that are islamophobic are also going to be more hardened. What I do notice is that social media just magnifies the problem. Everyone, from a no talent blog writer, present… thank you very much, to tik tok and X posters are going to have an opinion on the matter. Most are going to be wrong but have enough truth to make them seem credible, that’s in between their videos of how to get a flatter stomach while enlarging their glutes all in one easy step…. walking into the plastic surgeon’s office.

Another thing that is happening is that Fox News and CNN are agreeing, mostly, that Hamas is to blame for this incident, maybe it is the end of times. While there are young college students all over the U.S. that are protesting Israel and favoring Palestine, most adults feel that Hamas is the true criminal element. To be fair, if the adults had taken the side of the Palestinians the college students would immediately reverse course and be on Israel’s side. That’s youth for you. But this also shows that organizations like Hamas have taken to social media, mostly for recruiting purposes and for misinformation, to sway the young people to be on their side. They come up with a fictious story, like how they can’t collect their inheritance because the Zionists are holding their bank account prisoner and if you donate $1000 to them , they can get their riches and pay you back $100,000 they got from the Nigerian prince they just talked to. They spin how they are the victims and how the other side are the tormentors and give a version of history that makes them seem like they are the nice guys that wield machine guns and kill innocent people. Now, I’m talking about Hamas, not the Palestinians. I don’t think they are the same, but one never knows. It’s scary how young people can be so easily manipulated by terrorist organization. They can’t build a decent refrigerator but they can navigate through social media like if they were walking in the park…. with submachine guns.

What I do notice is that whenever a camera is on in Palestine, someone picks up a child and starts running somewhere, who knows where and who knows who’s child it is. They are great at theatrics and selling their portion of the unjustly persecuted. I don’t know if to believe they are telling the truth or if they are auditioning for the next San Andreas sequel. I think half the kids are eating a Big Mac while being carried into the hospital. They’re not but they also don’t look hurt. No blood or limbs missing. No head wounds. No apparent injury. Just some guy running with a kid, looking like they don’t want to miss the bus, which is on the other side of the hospital.

I’m just not buying the Hamas is just defending themselves bit. They refused to have a two State solution, which seems to mean that they want all the land to themselves and want all the Jewish Israeli’s to leave. I don’t know if that is even possible, for one, I don’t know if they would like what Israel has become, nice. Angry people need something to hate and if they had places like Tel Aviv, they might relax and die of peacefulness. It just wouldn’t work.

In my opinion, everyone should make their own, if this is actually classified as a war, then Israel should completely seize the Gaza strip and make it part of Israel. If you are going to kill 1300 people because you disagree with their religion or their politics or maybe their choice of music, who really knows, then their is always a price to pay for the instigator or the loser. If Israel loses, I’m sure Hamas would take over their land, so, if Hamas loses, I think it perfectly fitting that Israel be able to take away their biggest military asset, the Gaza Strip.

Well, I think I stated where I am at in this… I’m pro self-defense and anti dumb-dumb. Who is who, is up to you. I will say…. Shalom….

I guess the other thing we should consider is if these demonstrations were planned prior to the invasion. If the concerted effort in the U.S. and around the world to hold rallies to sway Americans and the world to turn on Israel was something that Hamas had planned prior to invading Israel. And if so, is there any legal repercussions here for anyone that knew in advance of an impending invasion of Israel that killed Americans, if they didn’t report to the proper authorities.